| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Semiárido. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/06/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/06/2010 |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, J. A. de. |
|
Título: |
Diversidade de mamíferos e o estabelecimento de áreas prioritárias para a conservação do bioma caatinga. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SILVA, J. M. C. da; TABARELLI, M.; FONSECA, M. T. da; LINS, L. V. (Org.). Biodiversidade da caatinga: áreas e ações prioritárias para a conservação. Brasília, DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2004. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 263-282. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bioma caatinga. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação; Mamífero. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00686naa a2200157 a 4500
001 1855073
005 2010-06-15
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. A. de
245 $aDiversidade de mamíferos e o estabelecimento de áreas prioritárias para a conservação do bioma caatinga.
260 $c2004
300 $ap. 263-282.$cil.
650 $aConservação
650 $aMamífero
653 $aBioma caatinga
773 $tIn: SILVA, J. M. C. da; TABARELLI, M.; FONSECA, M. T. da; LINS, L. V. (Org.). Biodiversidade da caatinga: áreas e ações prioritárias para a conservação. Brasília, DF: Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2004.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Semiárido (CPATSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Rondônia. |
|
Data corrente: |
18/09/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/09/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
PFEIFER, L. F. M.; MAPLETOFT, R. J.; DARDAWAL, D.; SINGH, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIZ FRANCISCO MACHADO PFEIFER, CPAF-RO; Reuben John Mapletoft, University of Saskatchewan; Dinesh Dardawal, University of Saskatchewan; Jaswant Singh, University of Saskatchewan. |
|
Título: |
Effect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, v. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018. |
|
DOI: |
10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups. MenosThe effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced t... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Dominant follicle; Folículo dominante. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado de Corte; Ovulação; Rebanho. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Beef cattle; Livestock. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/183194/1/BJVRAS-injectable-P4.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02594naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2095966
005 2018-09-18
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2018.136924$2DOI
100 1 $aPFEIFER, L. F. M.
245 $aEffect of injectable progesterone on follicular development in lactating beef cows treated with estradiol plus a low-concentration progesterone device.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aThe effect of injectable progesterone was evaluated along with estradiol benzoate (EB) on the fate of the dominant follicle (DF) present in the ovary at the beginning of low progesterone-based TAI protocol. All cattle were given 500 µg cloprostenol im (PGF; Schering-Plough Animal Health for Estrumate, Pointe-Claire, QC, Canada) twice, 11 d apart, and allocated into two groups: Estradiol group (E group, n = 11) and Estradiol-Progesterone group (EP group, n = 11). Ten days after the second PGF (Day 0), all cattle were given an intravaginal progesterone device with half progesterone concentration (Cue-Mate with a single pod containing 0.78 g progesterone). Concurrently, all cattle were given 1.5 mg im of estradiol benzoate in 3 mL of canola oil and PGF im on Day 0 of the protocol in a crossover design, in which each cow received both treatments. Cows in the EP group also received 100 mg im progesterone (Sigma) in 2 mL of canola oil. On Day 8, progesterone devices were removed and all cattle were given PGF im. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.0. The DF present on Day 0 ovulated in 76% (16/21) of cows from E group and 28.6% (6/21) of cows from EP group (P = 0.002). After progesterone device removal, the size of ovulatory follicle did not differ between groups (E group, 15.5 ± 0.43 mm vs EP group, 15.8 ± 0.98 mm; P = 0.82). These follicles ovulated in 81.3 ± 3.1 h in E group and 71.0 ± 6.1 h in EP group (P = 0.13). In conclusion, injectable progesterone reduced the proportion of cows that ovulate the dominant follicle present in the ovary at the beginning of estradiol-progesterone-based protocols. However, no difference was detected on time of ovulation after progesterone device removal between groups.
650 $aBeef cattle
650 $aLivestock
650 $aGado de Corte
650 $aOvulação
650 $aRebanho
653 $aDominant follicle
653 $aFolículo dominante
700 1 $aMAPLETOFT, R. J.
700 1 $aDARDAWAL, D.
700 1 $aSINGH, J.
773 $tBrazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science$gv. 25, n. 2, p. 1-8, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Rondônia (CPAF-RO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Catálogo Coletivo de Periódicos Embrapa; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Trigo. |
|
Identificador: |
69 |
|
Data corrente: |
09/05/2002 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/04/2015 |
|
Código do título: |
0900016 |
|
ISSN: |
0301-2123 |
|
Código CCN: |
000690-4 |
|
Título e Subtítulo: |
ACTA BIOLOGICA PARANAENSE |
|
Entidade: |
Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Federal do Parana |
|
Local de publicação: |
Curitiba, PR |
|
Periodicidade: |
Irregural |
|
Inicio de publicação: |
1972 |
|
Coleções da unidade: |
Embrapa Florestas
1972 1(1/2,3/4); 1975 4(1/2,3/4); 1976 5(3/4); 1983 12(1/4); 1985 14(1/4); 1986 15(1/4); 1987 16(1/4); 1988 17(1/4); 1989 18(1/4); 1990 19(1/4); 1991 20(1/4); 1992 21(1/4); 1994 23(1/4); 1995 24(1/4); 1996 25(1/4); 1997 26(1/4); 1998 27(1/4); 1999 28(1/4); 2000 29(1/4); 2001 30(1/4); 2002 31(1/4); 2003 32(1/4); 2004 33(1/4); 2005 34(1/4); 2006 35(1/2,3/4); 2007 36(1/2,3/4); 2008 37(1/2,3/4); 2009 38(1/2,3/4); 2010 39(1/2,3/4); 2011 40(1/2,3/4); 2012 41(1/2,3/4)
Embrapa Meio Ambiente
1972/2012 1(1/2); 4 (1/2,3/4); 5(1/2,3/4); 6(1/4); 8; 7(1/4); 8(1/4); 9(1/4); 10(1/4); 11(1/4); 12(1/4); 13(1/4); 14(1/4); 15(1/4); 16(1/4); 17(1/4); 18(1/4); 19(1/4); 20(1/4); 21(1/4); 22(1/4); 23(1/4); 24(1/4); 25(1/4); 26(1/4); 27(1/4); 28(1/4); 29(1/4); 30(1/4); 31(1/4); 32(1/4); 33(1/4); 34(1/4); 35(1/2, 3/4); 36(1/4); 37(1/4); 38(1/4); 39(1/4); 40(1/4); 41(1/4)
Embrapa Meio-Norte
1972 1(1/2); 1985-2008 14-38; 2011 40(1-4); 2012 41(1/4)
Classificação: 574.05
Embrapa Trigo
1972/91 1 1972; 2 1973; 3 1974; 4 1975; 5 1976; 6 1977; 7 1978; 8 1979; 9 1980; 10 1981; 11 1982; 12 1983; 13 1984; 14 1985; 15 1986; 16 1987; 18 1989; 19 1990; 20 1991; 28(1-4) 1999.
Classificação: 574.05 |
|
Fechar
|
|
|
